Gizmodo ran Windows 7 RC1 through a handful of benchmarks against Windows Vista today and the results are a bit of a mixed bag. Something I find very interesting is the authors comments on Windows 7 "feeling" so much faster, regardless what the benchmarks say.
The overall takeaway sounds like a mixed message: Windows 7 RC1 consistently beat Vista in raw benchmarks by a small margin, and lagged slightly behind Vista in some very real world measures. What's really interesting is that in regular usage, Windows 7 still feels faster and more responsive than Vista, even though the objective numbers say otherwise.
So my question is this…if it is a "slicker, more refined user experience" that "feels faster" then who cares about a few back and forth benchmarks? What do you think?
Comments
Posted by
Steve 12:02 PM (CST)